Opinion: Facing a surge in overdose deaths, D.C. must decriminalize drugs

By Shane Sullivan on

The profit-driven underpinning of all of our systems — including our public health infrastructure — has become plainer than ever through this ongoing pandemic. Eclipsed by the coronavirus’s pervasive impact, however, is another ongoing public health emergency that has received even fewer resources to adequately address it: overdose fatalities.

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, D.C. recorded 511 overdose deaths in 2020; preliminary 2021 estimates suggest a similar figure, both largely driven by the increasingly toxic street drug supply wherein fentanyl has largely replaced heroin and increasingly been found in cocaine and pills sold as opiates such as OxyContin and Vicodin. Though an imperfect analogy, the Iron Law of Prohibition — a phrase coined in 1986 — posits that as drug enforcement efforts increase, the potency of the street drug supply does as well.

Fentanyl and other even more potent opiate analogues, such as nitazene, which was recently detected in D.C., highlight this link, especially as medical access to opiates has fallen to its lowest rate in 15 years, much to the detriment of chronic pain patients.

Black D.C. residents accounted for 84 percent of overdose fatalities in the past six years; they make up an even higher percentage of the 1,200 people arrested in D.C. for drug charges, despite similar rates of use by race. In contrast to the mainstream narrative of clinicians “overprescribing” opiates in economically disenfranchised and primarily White rural areas, people dying from fatal overdoses in D.C. are overwhelmingly older Black men, many of whom self-medicated with heroin for decades and did so with vastly lower overdose rates before fentanyl’s arrival.

Despite bipartisan agreement that the so-called drug war is a failure, we continue its barbaric practice of caging people for their drug use and target those most marginalized. The District’s LIVE. LONG. DC. initiative — the city’s strategic plan for addressing overdoses — recently allocated $1.75 million in its anti-stigma-focused marketing campaign while ignoring the obvious reality: Criminalization is stigma. How can we expect people who are actively using drugs to speak honestly with medical providers or loved ones about their use when often that use is a felony charge?

We also need to begin a national conversation about implementing a safe supply of drugs, as decriminalization alone won’t end the increasingly toxic drug market. Although relatively new, there are pilot programs in Canada we can look to as models. The concept of a safe supply seems “radical” only because of decades of drug war propaganda that has demonized certain classes of drugs while obfuscating the potential harms of alcohol. Very few among us desire a return to Prohibition. There is no innovative program, no brilliant new treatment modality that can stem the gaping wound caused by the bullet hole of these drug war policies of criminalization, surveillance and punishment.

We’ve been in a sustained state of emergency for so long that it’s easy to accept this as the status quo. But nothing is normal about losing more than 500 of our community members to fatal overdoses every year (or 100,000 nationally), and it’s unheard of in countries that have shifted toward compassionate models.

I am a person who uses drugs who has worked in harm reduction for nine years and loved people who have used drugs for much longer. It’s long past time we listened to front-line workers and people who use drugs — especially those most directly affected — and uproot the policies of Prohibition that have been the driving force behind so much preventable grief and trauma.


Shane Sullivan is a community outreach coordinator at HIPS, a D.C.-based harm reduction nonprofit, and a core organizer with #DecrimPovertyDC, a coalition aiming to decriminalize drugs in D.C.

This article was original published on The Washington Post. Read the full article here.

Join the challenge this May

Sign up to walk this May and raise funds to support people to live a more fulfilling and balanced life.


Sign Up Today

Unite For Recovery Homepage Banner Mobile 1

Why opioid overdose prevention programs work as NYC leads nation with 1st center

By Kiara Alfonseca and Mary Kekatos on

It's been two months since New York City opened the first-ever overdose prevention center (OPC) in the United States, and public health experts said the clinic is already saving lives.

OPCs are a form of harm reduction, which is a set of strategies to minimize the negative effects and consequences linked to drug use, and "keeping people who use drugs alive and as healthy as possible," according to the U.S. government's Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

In this case, OPCs are place where people can use drugs in a setting with nurses or other clinical staff members present and who can help avert fatal overdoses.

As of Feb. 8, the center has served nearly 700 New Yorkers and intervened in 134 overdoses, according to...

Read more…

Suicides by drug overdose increased among young people, elderly people, and Black women, despite overall downward trend

By NIH on

A new study of intentional drug overdose deaths, or suicides by an overdose of a medication or drug, found an overall decline in recent years in the United States, but an increase in young people aged 15-24, older people aged 75-84, and non-Hispanic Black women. The study also found that women were consistently more likely than men to die from intentional drug overdoses, with the highest rates observed in women ages 45 to 64. In addition, factors such as time of year, length of day, and day of the week appeared to be associated with intentional overdose death rates. The study published today in the American Journal of Psychiatry and was led by investigators at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of the National Institutes...

Read more…

What Is Harm Reduction?

By Morgan Coulson, Melissa Hartman on

Harm reduction is exactly what it sounds like: reducing the harm associated with using drugs through a variety of public health interventions. But the concept relies on more than these tools and begins, at the most fundamental level, with recognizing that all people deserve safety and dignity. It does not treat drug use as a moral failing.

Harm reduction acknowledges that drugs are widely available in our society. It encompasses the understanding that traditional law enforcement approaches or those that require complete abstinence do not decrease demand, use, or negative health consequences of substance use.

WHAT PROBLEMS DOES HARM REDUCTION TRY TO SOLVE?

The primary goal of harm reduction is to save lives and protect the health of both...

Read more…